| fast seduction 101 promotion section |
 If you haven’t already visited the
 ASF forum or Player
Guide web board, now would be a good time to do
so… Don’t forget to this site! Fast Seduction 101
now has a 
product review section. |
It tastes like cream chocolate
1/10/02 5:39:36 PM Eastern Standard Time
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Mindauger:
Male Sexual Fitness: the built-in, permanent, remote control cock-ring
While endless publications are available, many noted here, that describe
sexual techniques that make a good lover, most ignore an aspect of male
sexuality that many cultures consider the cornerstone of male sexual
fitness. If you've ever heard of kegel exercises or the pubococcyx (PC)
muscle, then you might be aware that a strong PC muscle provides
incredible, almost preposterous benefits. I've seen mention here and
there in this list (going back to 2000 in my archives) about kegels,
mostly regarding extending distance of ejaculation, but nothing that
really covers the spectrum of benefits. Most people who have heard of
kegel exercises (which exercise and strengthen the PC muscle, and teach
control) think that they are only for women. Dr. Kegel developed the
exercise primarily to assist women after childbirth whose PC muscles
around the vaginal opening had been weakened. The effect was
incontinence, due to a weak PC muscle which it basically winds in a
figure-eight at the base of the pelvis. Dr. Kegel found that exercising
the muscle eliminated incontinence, but beyond that, actually made women
tighter than they were before they ever had a child!
Well, the good news is, men have the PC muscle too - and part of it wraps
around the very base of the penis. So what you say? If you ever stopped
taking a piss before you were done, that was the PC muscle at work. I'll
describe the benefits of a strong PC muscle, but admittedly, there's a
fine line when telling a bunch of guys about things like this. So lets
reframe it from the standpoint that ANY guy can achieve what I'm about to
describe. And quite easily, too. It takes no special gift, it isn't in
your genes, the benefits are there for the taking. I'll describe benefits
from my own experience, and also from research that I've done on the net
into what other men have said about the benefits of a strong PC muscle.
And the benefits work well with this group because they make a man more
sexually desirable, provided of course that you've had the chance to show
off your mighty PC!
So here's what you'd gain from developing a strong PC muscle:
First and foremost, is staying power so prolonged it seems laughable. I
read on the net that the average guy cums sooner than 3 minutes after
insertion, then goes soft. That seems laughable in itself, I seriously
doubt any of us here have so little control. But if you're "average",
take heart - kegels will save you. Flexing the PC muscle holds off
orgasm. For a long time. For a really long time - while maintaining
pleasure. But also, as the title implies, it gives you a permanent,
built-in, controllable cock ring. Why do guys use cock rings? Well, it's
just a fancy rubber band. If you're about to go soft, and you put a
rubber band on the base of your cock, what happens? Ya stay pretty hard.
I've never used a cock ring of any kind, but I know they choke off the
penis so that the blood that's inside it stays there and keeps it hard.
Well guess what? The PC muscle does the same thing and ten times better!
Which means after you cum, if the PC is flexed... lo and behold... you're
still hard. Sure, this isn't uncommon. Those that experience this likely
have well-developed PC muscles already, either by choice or by chance (in
my case, by chance). So when I talk about staying power, I mean the
ability to stay hard across several orgasms and not go soft for even a
moment. And ANY GUY can do this. And go for how long? Ten minutes? Duh.
Thirty? Sixty? A hundred? My personal best is just under three hours,
or roughly FIFTY times as long as average. Fifty. Then after a 10-30
minute break I repeat the whole thing once or twice more. I expect many
readers exceed this, but the point is that it is magnitudes beyond
average, and ANY guy can learn to do the same. Safe to say, if you can
last fifty times longer than the average guy (let alone ten times), you're
in demand. I currently have an HB-8 flying 1000 miles to see me again for
a few days, and I'm telling ya I ain't no PUA by a longshot (working on it
though). A strong PC muscle also provides longer, more powerful orgasms
(many men report this, based on my research). And yes, they do increase
the force of ejaculation, tripling or quadrupling distance compared to
average. Incoming!
Some cultures teach PC muscle control as a manner of course, simply
because it promotes sexual fitness. Even if you've mastered every
tantalizing technique of sex, a powerful PC muscle will only make it
better... A LOT better.
So, how the hell do you do these exercises anyway? Well, the first thing
is to find the muscle and flex it. It's pretty easy because as I said
it's the one you use to stop the flow of piss when you're taking a leak.
So one quick way to start learning is to stop the flow five or six times
when you're taking a piss. It might be hard to do at first, but like
anything practice makes perfect. There are a few techniques out there but
the one I think is most effective is the 6x4 routine.
- Continuously flex the muscle lightly and then harder and harder in 6
steps as you count from one to six.
- release for 4 seconds
- do four quick "flutters" of the muscle as fast as you can
- release for 5 seconds
- repeat! This should give you 4 sets per minute.
Of course, it gets easier to do it as you practice. Ultimately, you want
to do 20 to 400 of these in a day, and you can do them anywhere because no
one knows you're doing them. Whenever you look at your watch. Whenever
you shift into 5th gear. Whenever you pick up the phone. In time, your
PC muscle will be come stronger, bigger, and at your command. Results are
noticeable as early as 3 weeks. If you do them religiously for 3 months,
you'll be absolutely amazed at the results - and so will your HB :-)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dwacon The shadow of a dog ain't never bit no one (Copeland)
http://www.dwacon.com/:
Regarding Poetdude: Recent discovery: The exception is the older woman.
When I was a young kid just out of school, I found older (40-ish) women
were good teachers... 100% comfortable with themselves and you didn't need
to drive, just go along for the ride.
> NightLight9: I think you may be onto something. I'm beginning to piece this
(Mark's MO) together I think, and I also think I'm beginning to see how it
works. There is the Woody Allen AFC way most guys compliment a woman. It's
like they dropped a bomb and now they are waiting for it explode. "You are
soooo beautiful." Sincerest puppy dog look. This does not work
Dwacon: One variation that works for me is to ask something like, "What did
you do
to look so beautiful tonight?" This creates a trance state and if you
follow-up it is a good opener. Quite often, if a woman has sex it does make
her look better (the proverbial "glow") so it could be a boost or it could
be a bust depending on how she processes that... either to think about the
good feelings or to feel naked and repelled by "what does this stranger know
about what I did the other night?"
> Dean: I did a double take and turned around quite quickly looked at her and
pointed at her chest and said the word "Perfect". She looked at me and
replied "Do you think so?". I replied " I don't know, I'll have to check."
With that I closed the distance between from her left and put my right arm
around her, placing my left hand on her right tit.
Dwacon: I did something similar once and same thing... she was married but
enjoyed
the flirtation. What I didn't realize was that this had attracted the
attention of a couple security guys and for the rest of the evening these
two guys were shadowing me. Nothing came of it... but I would keep that in
mind.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NightLight9:
Commenting on personal pics: I took a pic of my buddy in the kitchen
holding a knife up and cutting some epis (weird French bread). There were
tomatoes on the cutting board. Anyway, he said he got lots of responses
because it looked so interesting (and of course what woman doesn't like a
guy who cooks). He also said it was weird because he's not into cooking.
But it opened the door.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Ross:
> Dolemite: Maybe a picture of you playing some sport or doing some hobby
would do the trick: skiing, surfing, boating, cycling, hiking, etc.
Whatever it is, it should be something that you TRULY enjoy. An "action"
photo should appeal to another's sense of adventure and excitement, and
women who like adventure and excitement are the are the kinds of women
we want to be with, right? The picture doesn't need to be a close-up, in
fact it shouldn't be, but it should indicate what you look like. An
expression on your face like you're really going for it and having the time
of your life is a VERY powerful thing, and opening your mouth wide and like
you're whooping or laughing hard also has the added bonus of somewhat
distorting your face so if you ain't Brad Pitt, you can at least peak their
curiosity.
Ross: No, no, no. Thanks, but no thanks. I appreciate the time invested in
writing the advice, but you don't understand.THE...CAMERA...HATES...ME. I
do NOT photograph well.
However...my chick friend who is a photographer did some great work with me
yesterday. We experimented with different lighting, testing first with
Polaroids, and I think we came up with some very good shots..half lit/half
in darkness. I look mysterious, intriguing, powerful, sexy, athletic and
it's hard to tell what I REALLY look like, so they will have to meet me in
person if they want more! I have a STRONG sense that this WILL work; all
of the women I have shown the Polaroids to have picked the SAME two as
their favorites. Among other
things, they use adjectives like, "Mysterious, intriguing, deep" etc. A
fully lit pic is just going to NOT be flattering no matter what I am
doing. What I have realized, thanks to a student of mine who is a
pro-photog is that a picture is NOT a depiction of a reality, but is a
FRAME through which people can be led to view you in a certain way,
depending on composition,
lighting, etc. So, using his model of Ben Stiller in this month's "Details"
magazine as a guide, my chick photog buddy and I whipped up some good shots.
Now..Cliffy.. As for sharing the letter that is getting a 70%
response...well, I don't want other guys blowing my gig. They will just use
my letter word for word. No thanks. I've worked for months to change it,
but I can share THIS. When I inserted a phrase about meeting
someone...feeling those butterflies...and then that rush of warmth...as you
imagine what could happen with this person..MY
RESPONSE TRIPLED! One phrase made a 300% difference.
> GM: But even then the odds are stacked against us and I don't think
there's a solution to consistent success.
Ross: I agree, but having a wrong or unattractive photo is a guarantee of
consistent FAILURE.
> GM: In my humble opinion, all these women are fucked up wasteoids with
serious issues, why else would they retreat to the internet...and my field
work over the last 12 months has verified this.
Ross: So far, judging from the few I HAVE met, I have to agree. One was
completely and utterly and hopelessly psycho (by the way, she had a
starring role in "Babe: Pig In The City". Rent the movie. She's the
exotic/spooky looking female inn-keeper). I have a feeling she's a multiple
personality.
The other seemed a decent sort but kind of depressed, within about 15
minutes of having coffee she mentioned she is on Zoloft.
> GM: They ask for "sweet and sensitive" they want someone to care enough
to pull their hair out by the roots while you're fucking them in the ass.
Ross: And..the problem would be?
> GM: I always take the opposite approach of what they "say" they want.
They're all freaks.
The difference is it's all playtime for me, I could care less if I ever
meet these women. I think some of these women are on here not to meet guys,
but because they have an agenda. It may include their ex-boyfriend, their
current boyfriend, or they're gluttons for attention, or they may be
emotional wrecks and just aren't available for some reason. I've had
everything work and I've had everything fail and all I can say is there is
no true fix on the compass for these neurotic fucked up Prozac ridden
airheads. And they don't deserve a break.....a temporary or on-call home
entertainment center is all they are good for. And I think there's a lot of
support for the 'fantasy" theory. I'm sure a ton of these girls are looking
to meet the next Brad Pitt on these services and when they set the bar that
high it's a no-win situation.
Ross: So...like..are you saying these aren't QUALITY women?
Ha ha ha..seriously, I was beginning to think I was paranoid or it was just
ME. Some of the responses I've gotten are seriously wacked, just in their
emails.
I'm going to let everyone know how the new pic works out. Proof sheets
should be in tomorrow for review.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
JM:
> JM: I'm confused. If you have choice with fucking women, are you really
not at choice for something long term when you want it, or am I
misinterpreting what you said?
> MB: If you are fucking women then you are fucking them. Whether that
goes further than that I find is usually up to the woman and if she wants
more she will suggest she wants more, talk about more or imply she wants
more in some sort of way.
JM: It does sorta seem as if rather than making an observation about
choice, you have observed that men typically don't WANT a relationship as
soon as or before a woman. That's pretty much been my experience, too.
Although in my last 2 LTR's, the women were both intelligent enough to know
not to push me (fear of take-away), so they danced around it until I said
it was ok. Fine by me, because that shows they respect my desires, which I
like because that shows self-control, and self-respect on their part too.
Essential qualities to me. But at the same time, I guess ultimately even
though they WANTED the relationship before I did, I was the one who chose
it. Go figure! : )
Personally, I think that generally men sort for difference in their
sex-partners and women sort for sameness, after they've picked the best
they think they can get. Of course, there are exceptions, and I'm not
saying it's hard-coded, although that might be partially true. But all the
women I've been with after SS seem to want an LTR pretty much right away,
and in talking to them about it, they say they could be happy being with
the same man (me) and watching that one relationship develop as the
feelings just continue to grow deeper and richer every day for the rest of
their lives. Whereas I know for myself, even if I had a stable of 40
ultimate babes,
eventually I'd have to spice it up with a few differents here and there. I
dunno, maybe that's just me; I know I have a pretty serious difference sort
in general.
> Dolemite: Even a good portrait can looked canned or somehow
"artificial," and they often aren't a good indication of how a person looks
in real life. After all, it was taken in a studio (can you say retouching?)
JM: On the photo subject: I have had the most success with a pic with a
really big fat honest smile on my face (taken by a girl who I was having
fun with) and simultaneously presenting a picture from a Dell ad that had a
little mouse with sunglasses on. And I don't think anyone would care if a
pic is retouched, as long as it's retouched well.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Mark B.:
> Poetdude: Recent discovery: all women are little girls on the inside. It
is a truly rare woman who is sexually aggressive, knows what she wants or
is good in bed -- and one who is all three is practically nonexistent. So
it is always, ALWAYS up to us to find them, lead them, demonstrate to them
what's been missing and show them a good time. I just spent New Year's Eve
(and day) with this one cutie, and I found that at age 28, she had never
had an orgasm with a guy -- ooohhhh my God. And I'm finding that this is
totally commonplace... so go get 'em, cowboy. We've got what the other
boys, past and future, simply don't have. To summarize: women are not
scary; *we* are. hehehe.
MB: Most of them are. Even when a woman agrees to fuck you most if not all
of them just lie there on the bed and look at you with a "take me" look.
This is why I believe it's our job to go after them and put them in a place
where they are open to receiving us. I believe that most techniques
designed to "make an HB come to you" miss the point and do not work as
often as well as ones focused on making her submit to us. Even this one HB8
that asked me to take her home once just lay on the bed naked waiting for
me to "take her"
> Ross: MOST guys NEVER have a woman approach them first. You simply are
not able to acknowledge what having great looks will get you and what it
will allow you to SKIP OVER.
MB: Most women do not approach me either but irrespective of looks smiling
at them and making eye contact seems to elicit the same from them and
sometimes if they are so inclined they may say "hello" or "hi" first or
make some general comment. Then it's up to you. I also found that having a
relaxed face works well in appearing harmless and most women approach me
when I feel most relaxed and easy. For some reason having a very relaxed
face works very well. Anyone suspect why? Ross maybe you know?
Regarding pictures how about a baby picture of yourself or one of you as a
young boy, if your adult self does not seem to work. This is surely likely
to be perceived as different and spark some curiosity. After all how many
of us were truly ugly as young boys?
> NightLight9: I've been thinking about what it's like to be really good
looking (as a guy).
Here's why I think this is important. I'm an average looking guy. Some
women think I'm cute... some don't, but I work out regularly, look better
than average naked, dress well, wear an appropriate amount of cologne, etc.
The reality is that women's opinion on looks changes as they interact with
you.
MB: I have been told I look good but at the same time I know I am not every
woman's type. Women have said "Mark you look like a real man, not a pretty
boy but more like a masculine man with strong male features and a great
smile and piercing eyes." But looks are different from attraction as women
may find me good looking but some may not find themselves attracted to
me. This is why I believe that knowing that one looks good is not enough
as you also need to know that you are physically and sexually attractive to
a woman as in being her type. So in essence good looks do not mean much in
terms of knowing whether one is sexually appealing to a woman and it still
takes work and effort to find out. Besides women have said "I fucked you
because I felt comfortable around you, you are easy to talk to, you make me
feel sexy and
good about myself, etc." not because you necessarily look good.
> NightLight9: So the question is, how do you model being a (cool) good
looking guy (who has been one for a while)? I know much of our general PUA
theory is actually fairly similar to a model of this. Qualify her, assume
the sale, etc.
MB: Imagine yourself being really good looking knowing that everywhere you
go people think you look good and see how you think you would act then and
then act like it.
> NightLight9: However, what about how good looking guys really think
about themselves?
The closest parallel I could draw was how I feel about my intelligence and
my snow boarding. My whole life I've had to meter what I say because people
both respect but also fear and dislike intelligence given certain
situations (I'm sure almost everyone on this list knows what I'm talking
about). Similarly, good snow boarders like to go snow boarding with me, but
not if
I brag that I'm great. Instead, I have to be cool about it and do/say
things that give away that I'm confident in my ability without coming off
as an asshole.
MB: It is not the advantage all who are not in there think it is because
there are so many other variables which contribute to attraction such as
personality, values, character, patience, intelligence, confidence and
others. Without these your chances are hopeless. Good looking guys face the
problem of not knowing which woman could be open and receptive to him even
if she is friendly. One problem I face often is women flaking out and lying
about their status - that is they do not want to admit they have a BF yet
they do not say they don't. They say "yeah there is this guy I see once in
a while but we are not serious or anything". They do this in order to keep
you around because they like your attention and in case the other guy bombs
out while not giving into you completely. Or they make partial commitments
but then do not follow through on what they say - rather than a definite no
or fuck off, asshole, it's a hesitant yes or maybe that many times leads to
nowhere......
> NightLight9: Being a good looking guy must have a whole set of similar
problems and pitfalls. One thing's for sure: good looking guys don't think
about being good looking. They think about getting what they want. They
know how they look is a feature of the terrain involved. You might want to
start incorporating this into your model of the world since you are a good
looking
guy.
MB: I beg to differ. When my tan is there, I look lean and am in great
shape, I know it and I smile more, act more confident, loose, relaxed and I
score significantly better than if I do not feel this way. I definitely
check my look and if I am satisfied with it my whole attitude is different.
In such a state, even if I do not get an HB's # or whatever I just say to
myself
"Well, she just did not see my greatness." If my look is not on and I fail
to get her # or whatever I take it more personally rather than placing the
onus of responsibility on her.
> NightLight9: I think you may be onto something. I'm beginning to piece
this (Mark's MO) together I think, and I also think I'm beginning to see
how it works. There is the Woody Allen AFC way most guys compliment a
woman. It's like they dropped a bomb and now they are waiting for it
explode. "You are soooo beautiful." Sincerest puppy dog look. This does not
work (until you are in a relationship with them, even then I'm not sure how
effective it is). Mark is not doing this, I don't believe. His compliment
is almost a challenge (not an overt or intentional one).
MB: What sort of a challenge does it pose when you structure a complement
this way? You got me thinking about this. When I compliment a woman, it's
always a part of the conversation, like it's not a big deal, just making
small talk and I do not expect anything in return and I never stop there
and look at her. Just follow up with more conversation;
Me "I think you are stunning. You have great genetic lines and a great
structure"
Her "Thank you that is so sweet"
Me "You know I bet a lot of guys come after you"
Her "Sometimes they do"
Me "Have you always been this attractive or is this something to took time
to develop?"
Her "I am not sure. I just bloomed this way"
Me "I am sure that if you entered a beauty contest you would win. Have you
ever considered?"
> NightLight9: He doesn't sit there and gage the reaction to see how she's
taking it and to see if it "worked". He just continues with his
conversation like it was normal for him to say this (not like he says it
everyday, but like it wasn't some event). I don't know if I'm doing a good
job of explaining this. But this is what made me come to this realization
so maybe it will help you.
MB: That is exactly how I do it. It's part of the conversation and her
attractiveness is something that we just discuss freely like talking about
the weather, our day, news, sports whatever - discussing it like it's not
big deal. And really when done this way they feel it's no big deal and they
feel great for you just noticed and acknowledged their need to feel beautiful.
> NightLight9: I had an incredible first meeting with this chick the other
day that I picked up in the gym. It lasted from 9:30 AM to 7:00 AM +1 day.
By the end of the night she was telling me how beautiful I am over and over
(this was after a lot of rapport building and connection building). At
first I was like "whatever". But after she did it a bunch of times it
became apparent to me that I was really enjoying it because she was very
sincere and she wasn't trying to get some sort of response from me. She was
just enjoying telling me. This was creating an incredibly powerful state in
me. I believe that this could be done to a woman, no problem.
MB: At the gym when people come up to me and say "You look leaner and
better than last month," I feel great that they took notice of my hard work
because it's something specific they noticed. But when they say "You look
big" that means nothing because they do not appreciate anything specific I
have done. But it does feel good when they comment. It seems women gobble
it up even more, especially when it's that specific. I have a friend who is
34 who has
slept with about 1,200 women in his life (he managed a strip bar in
downtown Toronto for years but he fucks anything that moves including women
over 50 so do not feel bad but he has had his share of HB10's as well). He
is tall but not really that good looking and he is one that turned me onto
the idea of complimenting women. His favourite line is with a smile "I
think you
are stunning. Not only are you stunning but you also have a lot of class
and that is rare to find there days." Before you know it they are gobbling.
> Stephane: I bet you're afraid to talk like that to women. I hope you'll
be as surprised as I was when I discovered that 99.999999999999% of the
women out there all love to be dirty-talked.
MB: Oh, hell yeah. I love being super graphic with women. I say to them
"Wow I love the taste of your pussy. It tastes like cream chocolate and
want to lick up all your juices right here and now and cum all over your
lips" and they love it. One HB I bone regularly is on her period. I said to
her "Come on over. I want to fuck you and smear myself with your blood all
over my
face, arms, chest and stomach" She laughed and agreed to come by for a nice
bloodbath.
> Stephane: I know ALOT of guys that would NEVER talk like that with their
sisters. It's taboo to most guys, I would think. I agree that one should be
able to discuss sex issues with one's sister as frankly and freely as you
do with your best friends. And it's amazing because it's rare and valuable. OK?
MB: I am surprised how rare it is but I do not find anything really
unacceptable to talk about in this world with anyone. Even George Bush
farts and probably gets a good laugh out of a loud bomber so why not have
fun even with someone like him? I find that the more repressed people seem
to be the more they desperately desire for someone to make it acceptable
for them to let loose. I am not sure why I am this way but as a kid I often
got in trouble by swearing too much, challenging what teachers were
teaching me, revealing to others what my parents said about others in
private as well as saying the most outrageous things in class. There are so
many interesting things to talk about in this world, why limit yourself due
to your fears or what you think people can take? Therefore say "I would
like to cum all over your face a give you a nice semen mask for the night"
is so much fun and when you get to do it is even more better.
MB: On the issue of erectile dysfunction. I am certain that it's diet as
well as your psychological make up. Until I discovered I only like to bone
dark skinned women, I could not get it up for a pale white girl no matter
how hot she was and I still cannot. Try renting a few porno's with all
sorts of women - pale white to Asian to black to fat and skinny ones and
just stand there naked in front of the TV until your dick goes up on it's
own. Then see what type of woman got you the biggest boner and then only go
for that type.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
| cliff’s list advertisment section |
| Cliff’s Comment: For those of you who are
just reading about this for the first time, I decided a couple of emails ago to add links
to these emails. The idea would be to get enough money in to hire someone to take
over the administrative work (and also to buy things which would improve this list, such
as proper mailing list software) for this list. If you were going to buy the product
anyway, just use the link that appears below and you are helping to keep this list going
at no extra cost to anyone. NON SEDUCTION-RELATED:
RECOMMENDED:
NOT REVIEWED YET:
|
| cliff’s free plugs section |
Cliff’s Comment: The following are all
recommended but clicking on the links and buying from them doesn’t send any money back
here (it is also recommended that the sponsors of these sites consider setting this up —
from the little experience I have had since I started the commercial section a couple of
weeks ago, I think you are missing a lot of business by not doing this):
|
INFORMATION ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE:
This is an archive of a free e-mail list relating to seduction,
maintained by "Clifford". Your comments are requested, encouraged, and
greatly appreciated (note that comments from different people are separated by
IIIIIIII’s). If you know anyone who would like to be added to the list, or if you
would like to be removed from the list, send an e-mail asking to be added or removed to cli***f@cl***.com[ ? ]
and it will be done. If you would like to be added to the free joke list, just
ask. For those of you unfamiliar with the references to Speed Seduction»Â®, Clifford
highly recommends your visiting http://www.seduction.com/. For those interested in seeing
the previous e-mails that were sent out ("the archives"), they are available on
request to Clifford or, preferably, can be browsed and searched at the archive at http://www.fastseduction.com/cliff/.
By your accessing this archive, you understand that the information contained in within is an expression of opinions, and they should be used for personal entertainment purposes only. You are responsible for your own behavior, and none of anything you read herein is to be considered legal or personal advice. You also understand and agree that any products you may order as a result of your reading about them in this archive are produced and sold independently from us and that any complaints, disputes or other issues which you may have with the sponsors of these products are to be dealt with directly with said sponsors and we are not responsible in any way whatsoever for any issues which you may have with them. If you are not in agreement with any of this, please leave his site now.
DISCLAIMERS:
This newsletter and the newsletter archive in general is reproduced here
with Clifford’s permission. Visual enhancements and search features have been added
by the fastseduction.com webmaster to facilitate the reading and researching of the
content. The raw text as it appears here is exactly as it appeared in the original
e-mail newsletter. Products, services, or external web sites mentioned or linked to
in this archive does not denote endorsement of those items. The contents reprinted
here are the opinion of the original writer(s) and are not necessarily the opinion of, nor
endorsed by, the owner(s) or operator(s) of fastseduction.com. The archive
enhancements are generated automatically and there may be occasions where the visual cues
don’t correlate exactly with the textual context; most of the time, though, the
enhancements are pretty accurate. The archive is updated as regularly as possible,
whenever new newsletters are sent out.
