mASF post by "Prime Alpha"
posted on: mASF forum: Field Reports Discussion, November 11, 2003On 11/13/03 1:07:00 PM, laydee1 wrote:
>That's a little too digital. Looking
>good or at least taking care of your
>body is BETTER....but no
>guarantee...
Yeah, seems we agree on this part. I refer to good looks as a "bonus modifier",
like in D&D :)
>For most HSE women, the equivalent of
>category b doesn't exist...
>Whereas I'm not sure if category c is
>something guys relate to. You tell me?
If HSE is high self esteem... wouldn't that negate C ??
I know a girl with no A. Sad mental case, heh.
Anyways, interesting theory... I don't think many guys have a C, especially if
no one knows about it. Some argue that if no one else knew about it, everyone
will sleep with everyone.
If you switch the "embarraced" in C to "uncomfortable", it makes better sense.
I, for example, don't think I have a C anymore, and even b is kinda half A for
me, meaning, if there isn't at least some chemistry or energy, I just don't
wanna touch the girl.
I'd actually assume that many girls have C instead of B, and that's why they
need to be "worked" on with all the techniques herein... Maybe some girls need
the man to turn the C or B into an A, I dunno...
>There also seems to be a general
>consensus between men on what is a HB or
>SHB....one of my guy friends has a
>phrase to cover it, calling it
>"appreciating art"
Heh, I'm an art lover then... ;-)
I think there's a consensus on what a SHB9 is.
As for a SHB10 - That, I think, is more personal. A SHB10 for me, is a SHB9
that I find particularly attractive. Another person might just give her 9. It's
not that I don't think there is a perfect women; It's just that the term
perfect is more individual and relative. Speaking of a "publicly" perfect 10
doesn't make much sense to me, unless maybe many, many males think she's a 10
for them, so you could say she's a "public" 10 [am I making sense :) ?]
>With women, it seems different...you
>hold up Brad Pitt as your equivalent of
>a SHB10...but for me, he's ok, but I
>wouldn't drool over him....whereas there
>are other guys who I find really
>attractive and I know other women don't
>see it - Michael Biehn (in his
>Terminator days)...
Yeah, I see what you're getting at... I bet many girls also like the ragged
manly type Bruce Willis usually plays, more than some of the pretty-boy actors
[Although, I must admit that two of the most famous pretty boy actors, Tom
Cruise and Brad Pitt, actually became very good actors, and play some manly
roles... check Tom out in Minority Report, and Brad in the immortal FightClub]
>That is POSSIBLY answered by my earlier
>points...
What I meant was, someone who you don't find immediately good looking, and
you're not immediately attracted to.
But you answered that already later in the post (if the girl's not sure, then
it's the moves... etc).
Still, if you found them initially hot, regardless of what others think
("conventional"), then they still had a bonus with you, since what you think
matters, not any conventions.
>Thus, if we want a guy to succeed, we
>will overlook all errors until he does -
>screw up a million times, and we will
>give you a million and one chances to
>get it right...
Unless he does something really, really stoopid...
>whereas if we WANT a guy
>to fail, just because we're not
>attracted, he will fail....sorry!
The former (want him to succeed, and helping) sounds logical.
The latter, wanting someone to fail... come on, most girls have no phucking
clue what they want. The poor things put every man on trial with a plethora of
tests, some of them rather unnecessary... even males they are admittedly
attracted to.
In fact, you remind me of this girl (the girl I mentioned above, that has no
A...).
I don't know if she wants guys to win, fail, or whatever. I don't think she
knows what she wants...
Her good friend, that is also my good friend, told me the girl doesn't stop
talking about me (!), comparing other men to me (!!), and when asked, for
example, "why don't you like this or that guy/ go out with them/whatever", she
answers "nah, he's not like Prime Alpha" (!!!!!).
Her friend convinced me to try advancing things.
I did... and got results that could best be decribed as what I like calling a
"windows blue screen", you know, that piece of blue shit that won't go away no
matter how many time you press ctrl-alt-del.
She lets me touch her, but backs away, she's not sure what she wants, she's
phucked up, and frankly I'm not sure I want this "project"...
[if it is of any relevance, by the way, she has never had an orgazm, according
to her, and her whole attitude towards sex is rather weird].
Sadly, there are many girls like this. They just don't know what the hell they
want.
>but if we've decided in the first
>millisecond that a guy isn't going to
>get anywhere, that's how it's going to
>end up.
I once thought that girls really do decide very fast, in a matter of seconds,
if they'll sleep with a guy. Experience, however, changed my perspective... I
really don't think this is the case any more...
As some one very well put it, "some girls make up gigantic hurdles [for the man
they are attracted to] for reasons which even they cannot fathom!".
Where are those A girls you talk about? Those girls that test their attraction
interest subtly and gracefully, those girls that go with the flow?
*sigh*... :-)
>What you and I and most of the forum are
>talking about is the middle-ground. If a
>girl isn't sure if she likes a guy or
>not, then it's the MOVES that make the
>difference, ok?
Oh I totally agree. It's just that most girls, it seems, deliberately put
themselves on middle ground! And if not, then their stoopid friends are glad to
help them [vis-a-vis - "cockblock". Concordantly, ergo...].
>conclusion
>- well-rounded is better.
I totally agree. I know some girls I'd rate an 8, for example, that have an
"all around" score of near 10 for me, and I wouldn't hesitate to go out with
them, instead of a SHB10 that has a lower "all around". I don't like "sex
dolls" that do nothing interesting either.
>Look at what
>is missing, be honest about yourselves
>and work on it.
Hmmm... I honestly need some more upper chest and outer biceps, heh ;-)
>tried different
>sports,...
Phucking shoulder dislocations, phuck phuck phuck :-/
>Sometimes, impressing a girl takes more
>studying than you learn on this forum!
I'm fond of remembering times when it was so simple and flowy, I don't even
remember what was done right or when or whatever...
*sigh*... :-)
>For me, I like someone who...
If you really know what you like in a man, what you are looking for... then you
are the exception to the rule ;-)
Thanx for the reply, interesting to read a [non-mental :-P] female's
perspective!
|
