mASF post by "BLscorpZ"
posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, August 8, 2001"monopod" <mon***d@NO***.com[ ? ]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Chicks are human too, and being human they crave at a fundamental level not
> just material things like money, dinners, presents, etc., but the power to
> exert true control over the lives of other human beings (in other words,
> AFC's). The PUA, who is a true alpha male, cannot be controlled, so thus he
> represents the antithesis of the women's perceived desire of the world. I
> tend to disagree slightly with BLScorpZ's assesment that women get bored of
> that control -I believe that once they have that kind of full power over an
> AFC's life, they get bored with their _scope_ of control, and want to expand
> it to others, like an expanding empire.
Ah, good point. I think that's what I meant.. you worded it better
than I did. It does explain why chicks tend to cheat on or leave
their AFC hubbys or borefriends. They think when they have full
control of their hubby/BF, they have that territory "secured" and they
must go on and expand their "empire", and "secure other territories"
under her control. IOW, they go after other men that they think they
can't have or are more challenging than the man (men?) they have now.
Just like a PUA securing territories (read: pussy) so that he can have
all the pussy he wants, whenever he wants it. Interesting analogy.
> However, he is right that there is
> a lot of "player-bashing" going on, and I've noticed it too in my pivots and
> girls I've hooked up with -they always talk in perjorative terms about
> PUA's, and even if they deeply inside feel they want a PUA to sweep them off
> their feet, they outwardly continue to contribute to the social conditioning
> that creates AFC's. Eg. "You're a slimy player, aren't you? Are you just
> using me for my body, because I have breasts? I'm such a whore..." told one
> girl to me quite accusingly, even though it was clear that she wanted it
> badly while we were hooking up. But hey, a true PUA doesn't care about what
> other people think, and neither should we.
>
> Cheers,
> monopod
>
> draxis <dra***1@ho***.com[ ? ]> wrote in message
> news:Jdfb7.67752$sf2***1@ne***.com[ ? ]...
> > the website has something that caught my attention:
> >
> > "The difference between how men and women think about dating - and why
> > most women want to keep you from being successful."
> >
> > Ive always got that vibe from women...like they have a vested interest in
> > peventing AFC's from becoming PUA's what does the book say about that?
> What
> > do you guys think?
> >
> >
> > "BLscorpZ" <bls***z@ao***.com[ ? ]> wrote in message
> > news:20010805122609.02093.00002659@ng-bd1.aol.com...
> > > I've read it, and IMHO I think he offers very good advice on how to
> communicate
> > > with women and how to take the next step.
> > > There are some things he talks about that seem pointless, such as
> washing
> with
> > > soap 3 times in the shower or does your shoes and belt match. I just
> skip
> the
> > > trivial stuff like this and get to the parts where he actually talks to
> women
> > > and what works for him.
> > >
> > > I've field-tested some of his ideas, and they do work. His attitude is
> very
> > > PUA and quite the opposite of AFCs. A few of his ideas does go against
> the
> > > grain here, and that just reminds me that there is no hard and solid
> rule
> > > written in stone that works 100% of the time. I think its worth reading
> this
> > > book and trying his ideas out.
> > >
> > > Even though his title sounds AFC, the most of the content of his book is
> pretty
> > > much like ASF and he introduces some new ideas that ASF or SS hasn't
> mentioned.
> > >
> > > I'm not trying to advertise for his book, and this is just MY opinion.
> All I'm
> > > saying is that I know his stuff is valid and that it works because I've
> > > field-tested it myself.
> > >
> > > HTH
> >
> >
|
