Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms
page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion
forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
[posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]
mASF post by "broiledbrain"
posted on: mASF forum: Advanced Discussion, March 3, 2004Definitely every woman is genetically hardwired to betaize any alpha that she
gets -- but why does that preclude the possibility of an alpha provider?
It seems to me not impossible for there to exist a guy who is alpha and does
not supplicate, who at the same time has the resources to provide for his
LTR(s). In fact I would say there are many examples of this. Hugh Hefner,
Donald Trump come to mind but I think there are quite a few more than that.
There are many multi-millionares for whom the lavish support of mistresses
would not be an appreciable cost in their net worth.
Being an alpha and a provider doesn't necessarily mean that the alpha has to be
in an exclusive relationship with the chick. Even if it is an exclusive
relationship it doesn't have to mean that the provider HAS to supplicate. In
fact we can observe that the provider has the ultimate takeaway: withdrawal of
his support.
If you disagree, please tell me why.
|
Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2004 by
"broiledbrain" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for
reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the
original author.
