mASF post by "formhandle"
posted on: mASF forum: Field Reports Discussion, January 1, 2003Manifestis3 (TylerDurden) wrote:
>bros, sorry to let you down...
>there's no way I'm posting
>pics on a public forum for my
>campus mates to find out that
>the scheming womanizer that is
>TylerDurden and the real me
>are one and the same..
Photoshop + blurring of faces and identifying details. FWD them to me, I'll do
editing, then FWD them back for your approval before posting.
Don't mention something like this if ya can't back it up.
>I don't even post full lay
>reports beyond the initial
>pickup, let alone my pics..
Don't care about your mug, T. I'll blur it out. I know you think everyone
might not be able to resist themselves and jack it off to your pretty face, so
we'll hide it from them... LOL
>was just mentioning it so my
>very close friends/wingmen
>from this board will know that
>I can show them.. there
>nothing special about it..
>just some guys with some
>triplets..
Yup, just some guys with triplets...
>anyway, the bros are waiting
>downstairs to go out to Mexico
>or some shit.. maybe some
>other club here, I dunno.. but
>that was definetely funny
>shit.. I'll bump into the Dahm
>triplets again, I'm sure..
>Paps has connects with
>Playboy..
Then I guess you'll be sarging playmates from now on?
>btw, they were actually kinda
>LSE, and VERY boring.. I would
>NOT have laid them, even if it
>was ALL THREE..
You know, I'm seriously not going to let this macho talk slide. You can't drop
in here & name-drop and then blow it off like the king without some form of
validation. If it's not a big deal to you that they were the Dahm triplets,
then you wouldn't have made such a big deal about it in a posted field report.
You would have just said "3 hot triplets". On top of that, you mentioned pics.
Why mention the pics at all?
>they fucked HUGH HEFNER, who
>has been with
>like THOUSANDS of little hoes
>even back before condoms were
>INVENTED.. NO THANKS, I'll go
>get with some equally hot
>non-hugh-laid chick...
Yeah, that is definitely safer. 'Cuz Hugh is lookin' pretty unhealthy for his
age, so he must have a disease, while some chick who's background you know
nothing about is more likely to be disease free. :-) (See the smiley? It means
I am ribbing you.)
>besides, they are NOT as hot
>so much as PHOTOGENIC..
That must be my problem, too. I just haven't had my "good side" photographed
yet... I'm like on the VERGE of photogenic.
>Most
>of us on this board have
>gotten with much hotter
>girls.. They were kinda sweet
>though, and I was really
>connecting with the one that I
>briefly blew off (the outer
>Dahm triplet) to go read the
>birthday of the other Dahm..
>Had I not been CB'ed by the
>security guy, I would have
>gone back to her very
>shortly.. oh well, fun shit..
>
>IMO, celebs are NOT as hard to
>sarge as you think.. in fact,
>very easy, given the way that
>OUR game is GEARED.. put me in
>front of a HB7 - THERE is the
>*real* challenge..
>
>unless I employ the recently
>discovered UG theory, that is!
>:)
Yeah, whatever that is... (rolling eyes)
--
jay [[email protected]]
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
|
