mASF post by "SoEZ"
posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, July 7, 2002I scanned this article and saw so many mistakes that it's not even funny...
trying... women giving a sh##, money... time... effectiveness...
results???... no!!!! I will elaborate this time... figure out your frame...
speak from there... congruently... THERE IS NO TRYING... SoEZ....
"Joseph_Lyon" <age***t@ro***.com[ ? ]> wrote in message
news:49e***e@po***.com[ ? ]...
> I bought the Double Your Dating E-book and though their are some good
> things in it, I regret buying it.
> Aside from some tips on clothing which I could have gotten from Maxim
> magazine or anywhere else and a few cool ball-busting lines, it is
> basically a rehashed copy of Ross Jeffrie's stuff.
> I have spent over $1000 on Ross's stuff, and I don't regret a penny of
> it.
> However, David D.s book is about the level of Ross's first book "How
> to get the women you desire into bed"
> I felt like I was experiencing deja vu when I read it. David makes fun
> of NLP on cliff's list yet tells his students to use it in the book.
> The cocky and funny stuff is good but Ross has been teaching cocky and
> funny for 10 yrs and I learned nothing new.
> Also, if you only use David's tech then you will only get a certain
> type of woman.
> Some women don't respond as well to cocky and funny. If a David
> student doesn't have cocky and funny, he has nothing.
> SS however shows a student how to give women a near ecstatic
> passionate experience without even touching her.
> Which one do you think would be more effective to seduce women?
> A guy who can inspire a little attraction and challenge by busting
> balls and neghitting, or a guy who can do that AND make her
> hallucinate and cum in her pants without laying a finger on her?
> David's stuff does work on young girls and women with low
> self-esteem who think that they should be dominated by men. But most
> real women need something more than just that. She could get that from
> any jerk in the neighborhood.
> Plus, David doesn't have the communication with his students that
> Ross does. He answers their questions curtly on his newsletter and
> doesn't encourage discussion like Ross does. I get the impression that
> Ross really cares about his students whereas David makes fun of his
> own students when they are failing and simply says "Good! I told you
> so!" when a student writes in sharing sucess.
> Plus, David is a very good looking guy. There is no way he can
> identify with his students like Ross can.
> Wherever you are on this ladder, Ross has been their too, and he can
> tell you how he got to the next wrung. What's more, if you are on his
> list, he has proven time and time again that he is willing to share
> his secrets with even the most inexperienced newbies.
> David on the other hand just says "Stop being a wus and read my book!"
> as if his techniques work on every woman every time regardless of the
> situation and regardless of the students state, beliefs, tonality,
> composure, etc.
> If you want to be cheap then buy from the copy-cat and you might
> have mediocre to decent success with a certain type of woman. By
> Ross's stuff and you will have great sucess with all kinds of women.
>
> Oh yeah! Being a true master of seduction takes time and
> intelligence. If you aren't very bright SS might be beyond you- it is
> the most powerful seduction tech in the world so of course it is.
> So if you are cheap and are just looking for a girlfriend and aren't
> necessarilly concerned with having the best woman you can get,
> DoubleYour Dating might be for you.
> But if you want to drwarf the success of legendary heros like Don
> Juan, SS is the only option.
> -Joe
>
|
