mASF post by "fre***n@my***.com[ ? ]" posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, August 8, 2000In article <20000820215933.02654.00000568@ng-fb1.aol.com>, [email protected] (Terrorex) wrote: > >Odious is apparently posting > >accurate, on target quotes and pointed accusations that are being met > >by kindergarten BS > > LOL. > > >No point by point address of the accusations? > > Then perhaps you missed my posts. > > Idious is pissed that he got burnt. He's mad his flames are nothing
more then > bad breath.
That's why he's known as ODOROUS. And don't forget his lack of
bathing...
He's angry that his 'evidence' is not 'evidence' when it comes to > who I am, or that I have any connection with the other names on his
dream list. > Idious cannot grasp the thought of more then one person not liking
him here, or > his butt pal RJ. And, Idious is definetly mad that his arguements
over customer > relations, business, etc, were 2 year old attempts at showing some
form of IQ.
But ODOROUS is just an asshole.
> He tried hard to show me some form of intelligence, and the moron
failed. He > tried to conjure up some witty flames, but he made himself look bad
each time. > He takes what people say out of context on purpose as his last resort
to make a > point / flame. Then when someone ends a post to him with 'your such a
moron, Im > kill-filing you'.. he then decided to kill file that person too...
and so > called 'unkill-file him' when that same person comes back to post
some shit > about his stupid ass a week later.
This and other reasons why he was run out of alt.flame and other
newsgroups...
> Idious is a follower, not a leader. He tries, he tries, he makes me
laugh. He > is just some lame bald kid that claimes he is a master of seduction,
yet spends > 24/7 posting to computer messageboards. If this is not what you call
lame, then > I dont know what is anymore.
ODOROUS couldn't get laid if he had to.
> Defending Idious on situations like this can make you look quite
stupid. > > Learn to read headers, then learn where they can possibly be FAKED.
Then get > yourself some modified TR's (if you can; ) and see who is who. Until
then, > don't assume I, nor any other person here, is the same. > > --------- - - - - -
Reasoning is quite over their heads.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
|