mASF post by "Gunwitch"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, June 6, 2005
I notice ya don't post the shit he was replying to.
A lot of it looked like advertisements to me also. Or no content posts about
MM.
So your idea is that anyone who disagrees with you shouldn't be posting?
That's what mysterys lounge is for I thought.
By the way unless he lied TD got good with GWM, not MM.
On 6/26/05 6:22:00 PM, Mystery wrote:
>On 6/24/05 7:58:00 PM, formhandle wrote:
>>Why do we need this? And why
>>are you presuming everyone
>>will agree with you? Also, I
>>notice you're from Canada and
>>**everyone** you list is
>>Canadian. Coincidence?
>>
>>Please keep the lame posts to
>>a minimum. I should just
>>shitkick this to Off-Topic.
>
>
>why do we need THIS? I believe
>formhandle, as a matter of principle,
>should not respond to posts. HANDLE them
>and put them where they belong but dont
>comment on them ... especially this way
>dude.
>
>Formhandle's LAST FEW POSTS/REPLIES:
>
>>Why do we need this? And why are you presuming everyone will agree with you?
Also, I notice you're from Canada and **everyone** you list is Canadian.
Coincidence? Please keep the lame posts to a minimum. I should just shitkick
this to Off-Topic.
>
>>Of course its simple, but Mystery didn't invent the idea, certainly not the
first to discuss it. What I was also getting at was you didn't describe what
you're talking about or leave an avenue open for discussion. You just posted
"XYZ rocks" and barely vaguely described what XYZ is.
>
>>Did you ever not have sex with a guy because he answered only yes or no to
questions you asked? Do you feel more attracted to a man when he was being more
considerate to you? Just the end results, not your wish or desire or feelings
on the matter...
>
>>If such posts were made here on the Reviews board, then they probably did not
follow the Posting Guidelines. If reviews were posted in any other section of
mASF then they didn't belong there, were moved here, then checked for whether
they followed Posting Guidelines. If anyone wants to complain about reviews not
being approved or removed from other sections of mASF then those people need to
review, understand, and abide by the Posting Guidelines.
>
>>Are we doing empty testimonials now on mASF? Either write up a full proper
review for the Reviews section or re-write this post to contain actual PU
information. Otherwise, I'll consider it spam or, at best, Off-Topic.
>
>and lastly ...
>
>>Then you need to be a more interesting person, with more interesting things
to say and have a vibe that displays enough value that the set will pay
attention to you without resorting to entertaining them to do so. That's like
picking random strangers on the street and giving then $5 to stand next to you.
You've got to work on getting people interested in you without the gimmicks.
The gimmicks are helpful, sure, and they certainly give you something to do and
create artificial interest but it's the person running the gimmick and his
state and how he carries himself that is more important and which leads to the
real goal - getting laid.
>
>I fully disagree. A gimmick is JUST
>another GAMBIT for getting the job DONE.
>Its not ARTIFICIAL INTEREST. If I teach
>or show something cool to a set, why in
>the world would some of that be
>ARTIFICIAL while others REAL?
>
>Here's how it works: if you say or do
>ONE interesting thing (gimmick or no
>gimmick) the target may think, "that was
>interesting." but string together a
>series of interesting facts or gimmicks
>and she'll think, "HE is interesting."
>Its no longer the material (gimmicky or
>not) but the PERSON saying/showing the
>interesting things that gets the aclaim.
>
>The concept of ARTIFICIAL INTEREST is
>... ignorant.
Get laid not just liked!
Http://www.dynamicsexlife.com/
"make the ho say no"
|
