mASF post by "Marque One"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, June 6, 2005On 6/6/05 1:39:00 PM, slashview wrote:
>I disagree that he "did not do
>anything". All the groundwork
>was probably already laid
>before the first time they met
>face to face.
Very much so - spot-on observation. My phone and email game is very strong - so
much so that I know I'm going to get a great reception on 95%+ of dates I go
out on. I'm maybe a 6.5-7 out of 10 on the facial looks scale, although I have
a good build without having to do anything to achieve it!
>In my admittedly
>limited experience with online
>dating, the actual meeting
>would go from hi to fuck in
>under an hour, usually way
>less if logistics were good.
That's definitely not my experience, slashview - I'd be very interested to hear
your thoughts on this.
>The reason being that while
>chatting with her online,
>you've already established the
>sexual tension, and in her
>mind she's already fucking
>you.
Exactly - it's amazing how many women called you 'babe' and blow kisses down
the phone at you when they've never met you if they are treated correctly.
>As for her "no sparks"
>comment, it could be a lack of
>emotional rapport. It really
>depends... Marque, do you want
>a LTR or FB out of this? If
>FB, then just amp the sexual
>attraction between both of
>you. From what I'm reading,
>this is present in spades. If
>LTR, then probably need to
>work more on the rapport.
As stated in my reply to Mrhviid (posted after your initial contribution), I
got a bit dazzled by this one - I wanted this one for an LTR. As heretical as
it might be to say to some on here, I'm sick of grabbing meaningless sex
whenever I can - I want something more.
Unfortunately, as it's been over a week since everything in my initial post
occured, I can't really see a way to re-enter the situation with her without
completely losing face. Suggestions are welcomed?
Marque One(-itis) ;-)
|
