mASF post by "OceanEyes" posted on: alt.seduction.relationships, May 5, 2005On 5/25/05 7:43:00 PM, hotlab wrote: >On 5/25/05 6:31:00 PM, OceanEyes wrote: >>On 5/25/05 4:15:00 PM, hotlab wrote: >>>On 5/25/05 3:33:00 PM, esk6969 wrote:
[]
>>So yeah, if I knew what to change about >>to >>myself to induce someone like Paris >>Hilton >>to turn into a purring little kitten >>cumdumpster breakfast queen, >>I have absolutely no problem doing just >>that. > >You will dump her later because you >loose respect for her and regret that >you've changed for her, i.e. that you >were supplicating by becoming the man >she's attracted to.
Contrary to popular belief, PH is NOT
stupid. In fact, she is extremely clever.
I am not at all attracted to stupid women,
but neither do I require a woman with as
much education as I have (a *lot*).
I cannot see any conceiveable regret from
changing myself to be attractive to the
women I am attracted to. How could there
possibly be a downside to having what
I consider attractive women being highly
attracted to me? I would dump her later if
she totally disrespected me. Been there,
done that, never again.
Let me put it differently: considering I
have to get up every day and wear clothes,
it's no skin off my nose to wear clothes
my preference in women find attractive.
>>Hotlab, I know you don't agree with a >>lot >>of what Franco, I and esk write, but you > >To avoid misunderstandings: > >I agree with a lot what Franco writes. I >felt that for some time he tried to >apply his MLTR experience in his >marriage. But I see now that he doesn't >do this. > >I agree with a lot what you write. >There's something to learn from. But the >experience you're going through now I've >had in the past and I kind of know what >is coming and I guess Franco knows this >too. > >I don't agree that much with what esk >writes, basically because I think that >he creates problems where there are >none.
My guess is that any problems he "creates"
are more a result of being a dad with just
a little too much on his plate to be proactively
fucking his wife enough. But it really isn't
any of my business. ;)
> > >>are >>a smart dude at least academically. > >Thanks, but I'm a smart dude in many >ways, else I would have not been able to >bring this intelligent, funny, caring >and extremely sexual HB9 into my life.
"At least" doesn't preclude anything else.
> >>If >>your bride goes to the alter with a >>smile >>of happiness, and your wife returns with >>a smile of triumph, you have been >>warned. >>You *will* be able to tell the >>difference. > >That won't happen. I'm so much the prize >for.. you can't imagine. My main concern >at the moment is how to give her more >power because when she is here the >balance will change extremely to my >advantage, which actually is a >disadvantage.
I perceive myself to be partly in a similar
situation. I am straight, handsome, employed,
well-educated, well-traveled and well-mannered
in San Francisco, after all. ;)
>> >>Besides, I thought alpha was doing what >>the >>fuck you wanted and not caring what >>people >>think. > >Absolutely true... but almost everybody >on this board cares about whether women >think that they are alpha.
Too true. My gf *feels* my masculinity,
I don't have to talk about it. Have to
demonstrate it once in a while though :)
[]
-OE
----------------------------
I get the WOMEN. --- Design
|