mASF post by "formhandle"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, March 3, 2004msp1911 wrote:
>Look dude, you don't own those
>ho's. You have no special
>"rights" to them.
That's not what I'm referring to. Just as I don't expect my blood brother to
be annoying or waste my time by hitting on chicks who are with ME, I would
expect the same from other guys who are my virtual brothers. And if the guy is
good enough to get his own chicks, he doesn't need to pick up on the ones I
work to bring. If he's not good enough, I won't care and blow him out or let
him blow himself out.
This isn't a general statement or opinion on PUing the chicks who are with guys
we don't know (ethics question), this is my getting an opinion of whether I
should bring chicks to events like the PU Summit or not, based on what I can
expect from my "bros" at the event. I have some chicks I'd like to see in LA
and if I get the sense that I can't bring any of them around without having to
double my game effort in order to deal with constant blocks from guys who are
supposed to be brothers, then I'll simply meet up with the chicks elsewhere and
not be around as much for the events. For stuff that happens around Boston,
I'd just choose not to bring the chicks around as it's convenient to see them
another time. But for the LA chicks, it's not like I'm in LA regularly so I'd
rather choose to be with them without extra hassles.
This is also vastly different than being in the field with any of these guys
and PUing "fresh" chicks/sets.
What I'm saying is, if I go out of my way to an event like this and go out of
my way to bring chicks that I worked to PU, I'm on *VACATION* mode and consider
it an insult and major annoyance to have guys wasting my time to blow out their
game attempts, if I had an expectation that could actually happen.
If a chick gloms onto a guy on her own, that's different.
>If those
>women choose to be with
>another man, then that is
>their choice. Even if it's
>another PUA that you know.
This isn't about the woman's choice, this is whether a guy who can get his own
chicks easily is out of line in blocking me from my own efforts, within the
context of a situation where we're all there to be bros. Notice that my main
concern isn't "losing" a chick, it's wanting to feel relaxed and not have to
deal with the annoyance of half a dozen guys "gaming" chicks I bring, making it
a pain in the ass for me deal with. It's like being on vacation with friends
and one or more of them banging pots & pans every morning at 6AM for no reason
other than they have "free will" to do so.
>...
>By the way, how do you know
>those women aren't fucking
>over you when you leave them
>at home? Huh? How do you
>know?
I don't and I don't care. It's not about that. I don't think you understand
my post. It's not an ethics question.
>I'm disappointed in you
>Formhandle. You should know
>the rules of the game by now.
I know the rules just fine. I'm just not interested in feeling like I'm
WORKING to keep the pussy I bring when I'm supposed to feel like I'm on
VACATION. If I get the sense that will be the case, I either won't bring any
chicks around or will meet up with them somewhere else. If I get the sense the
skilled guys there will respect my personal boundaries and not make bringing
chicks around a pain in the ass for me, then I'll bring the chicks.
--
jay [[email protected]]
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
|
