mASF post by "ockwick"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, June 6, 2005I agree that the debate between direkt and indirect is useless. There is no
debate. I however disagree that it's just an opener.
Come to think of it, whether using direkt, neutral or indirect openers, we are
all direct if we do things right.
Direkt, according to Shark, is all about desiring the target and making no
apologies for it. Sounds familiar to any oldie ASFer who kept hearing that from
Gunwitch, Ross Jeffries, MrSex4uNYC, Svengali, Rio, etc?? I bet it did.
And some of those guys wouldn't always go "direkt" on their targets. Sometimes
completing the sarge would require a different approach, taking a step back,
being a bit indirect, etc. Yet it all worked out, and in the end it was all for
the goal: fucking a chick.
So the REAL difference between direct and indirect (besides marketing tactics
used by a certain guru who wanted to make a name for himself when he started
his business) is that everyone who wants to get laid has the direct attitude of
"I desire this woman, she wants sex, I want to have sex with her, let's go for
it" - and they will using various tactics, whether it's asking an opinion
opener (which I don't like doing anymore but it very often did open), a
compliment/direkt opener, neutral or situational. Doesn't matter, as long as
the person is doing these things in order to score the chick.
Those who don't want to fuck a chick or sarge to impress other guys rather than
get laid, these are the indirect guys. They do things to avoid getting
rejected, to create flashy images of themselves that get them props (online or
not), etc. Hopefully there aren't too many of them around these parts...
Think about it...
ock.
|
