The Top Pickup Artist Forum On The Internet: Fast Seduction 101

Home | 

Eliciting v. Assuming Values

mASF post by Maxx

<< Home ... < Relevance Matches ... "ross jeffries"

Eliciting v. Assuming Values
You can search for more articles and discussions like this on the rest of this web site.

Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms page.  To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion forum at fastseduction.com/discussion. [posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]

mASF post by "Maxx"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, May 5, 2005

I can tell you about my version of eliciting values that worked for me, and
that is the one that is geared to establishing authority over her world.

I don't ask (any more) what she looks for in a guy, I ask about different
things that help me get an idea of what her personality is like. So I would go
ask something about the university she is at, something about her family,
something about what dreams of, something about the experiences that she's had
with other people.

I find it's difficult for chicks to verbalize what they look for in a guy.
Either because they are dumb or because the feelings associated with being
around an alpha male (which is what most girls like) are hard to describe for
anyone, even for the most eloquent of us.

So I would run a convo, ask her a lot SIMPLER questions, like what her
experiences were with people of certain zodiac sign. That's easier to process
for them than to tell you what they like or don't like in guys or people in
general.

She replies, from there I take it to feeding it back to her in my own words (I
do it because I like "well-written", structured and eloquent answers/speeches,
which not too many people in general are capable of).

Then she says yes, you're right (she can't say no, cause what I say to her is
exactly the same as what she'd say to me just a moment before) and maybe
continues to elaborate.

I gather info, and then give her back a picture of herself, which is most times
pretty accurate. I understand it as establishing authority over her world. I
know what she's like. And she knows that I know what she's like, and likes it.
I'd need to ask Ross Jeffries for the definition of establishing authority
(cause he coined it) but I think that's pretty much it.

Hence, it's really an attraction tool - you can't be sitting around the whole
evening analyzing her personality like a fucking shrink. 15 minutes would do.
It also creates rapport between the two of you.

After that I openly amplify my sexual state, start eye-fucking her and run
agressive kino, i.e. caveman her.

"I'd rather have no chick at all than supplicate to one"



Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by "Maxx" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the original author.

 

Copyright©1999-2010 Learn The Skills Corp. All Righs Reserved.
Translate: Translate “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” to English En “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” Español (Spanish) En “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” Français (French) Auf “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” Deutsch (German) No “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” Português (Portuguese) In “Eliciting v. Assuming Values - ross jeffries - Relevance Matches on Fast Seduction 101” Italiano (Italian)  Learn The Skills StoreStore