Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms
page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion
forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
[posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]
mASF post by "Phenix"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, July 7, 2005On 7/29/05 6:37:00 AM, Choumoux wrote:
>A mathematical study by the
>University College London
>(UCL) demonstrated that an
>invitation for wine and dinner
>is the most efficient weapon
>to seduce a girl... as opposed
>to offering expensive gifts...
>since you only pay for the
>invitation if the girl accepts
>it... inexpensive gifts are a
>no-no cause they won't work...
>
>D'Oh!
I just guess that the guy issuing the study is an AFC, Chou.
Why the fuck paying if we can fuck them for free ?
That is mathematic ! The real best weapon is the one that gets the same result
for less money...
>(The article goes on about the
>fact that physical attraction
>matters, but that gifts are
>important too!)
Prizing works better than giving... More important. It is your (perceived)
value that brings you results, not what you spend.
I'd say that the fact that a dinner-only is better than giving a diamond
necklace is that you don't appear needy and ready to buy as if you were certain
not to get otherwise...
>Science, brothers!
Art, Brothers, the A in PUA !D
Phenix
"I don't believe in mathematics."
Albert Einstein
|
Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by
"Phenix" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for
reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the
original author.
