mASF post by "zarathustra_fi"
posted on: mASF forum: Advanced Discussion, July 7, 2005On 7/20/05 3:50:00 AM, hotlab wrote:
Very good post Hotlab. Have a read at my question to PlayerSupreme in General.
Franco
seduction.com" target="_blank">http://www.franco-seduction.com
Online Seduction School for Single Men, Husbands & Players
"Sarge Est Necesse, Vivere Necesse Non Est " Gnaeus Pompeius, revised
>On 7/19/05 10:45:00 AM, Jestor wrote:
>>But that's part
>>of the culture of wanting the best, at
>>the expense of sexual frustration.
>>
>
>This is from a paper by David M. Buss, a
>professor for evolutionary psychology,
>who researches about mating strategies.
>
>In one study about short-term mating he
>let male and female experimenters
>approach strangers and ask them
>
>"Hi, I’ve been noticing you around
>campus, and I find you very attractive."
>
>and then...
>
>Would you go out on a date with me?
>Would you go back to my apartment with
>me?
>Would you have sex with me?
>
>"Of the women approached by the male
>experimenters, 50% agreed to go out on a
>date with him; 6% agreed to go back to
>his apartment; and 0% agreed to have
>sex."
>
>"Of the men approached by the female
>experimenters, 50% agreed to go out on a
>date, similar to the women’s responses.
>However, 69% agreed to go back to her
>apartment. And 75% agreed to have sex
>with her."
>
>But Buss noticed a problem with this
>result:
>
>"Although the empirical evidence is
>clear that men,
>far more than women, have a great desire
>for a variety
>of sex partners, there is a problem –
>men could
>never have evolved such a desire in the
>absence of
>willing women."
>
>So Buss researched further about the
>evolutionary reasons of women looking
>for short-term sexual partners. His
>results:
>
>"The hypotheses that received the most
>empirical support across studies were
>those of resource acquisition and mate
>switching."
>
>"For example, women judge it to be
>highly likely that they will receive
>jewelry, money, free dinners, or
>clothing by engaging in short-term
>mating. Furthermore, a critical context
>if which women consider short-term
>affairs is when the partner cannot hold
>down a job. Women who actively engage in
>short-term mating, in contrast to their
>more monogamous counterparts, judge the
>resource benefits to be »more
>beneficial«."
>
>"The hypothesized »mate switching
>function« of women’s short-term mating
>would, of course, only apply to context
>in which the short-term mating is an
>affair or an extra-pair copulation.
>Contexts in which women judge it to be
>highly likely that they will have an
>affair include »feeling that she could
>find someone with whom she is more
>compatible than her current partner.«
>Furthermore, women perceive it to be
>highly beneficial to discover a sexual
>partner who is interested in making a
>commitment to them, willing to spend a
>lot of time with them, and able to
>replace her current partner."
>
>So in conclusion (most) women willing to
>engage in casual sex do so (from an
>evolutionary point of view) for the same
>reasons they would engage in an LTR,
>namely to gain access to as much
>resources as possible for themselves and
>their offspring from a committed
>partner...
>
>in other words...
>
>They are always looking for a provider.
>
>hotlab
|
