mASF post by "therenegade"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, July 7, 2004On 7/29/04 3:17:00 PM, madbad wrote:
>
>I have had several GFs that
>were 10s. The were lovely,
>sweet, wonderful, and
>intelligent. We had great sex
>all the time, we smiled and
>laughed whenever
Thing is.... when one talks of the "10s" it is really important to work from
visuals, though this is difficult since fs101 is not big on using picture
examples. Because beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder when one talks
about this topic.
A few years ago I met some blow-hard seduction guru wannabee who shall remain
nameless. I met him because a friend of mine was telling my how amazing this
guy was, a real natural, yaddda yadda yadda. This was back in my days when I
was still in an effort to get to the next "level" in seduction, and go for the
"10s".
So I meet this fuck, and he looks at me and asks why the hell I'm having
difficulty with getting women. He goes into his whole take on seduction.. talks
about how easy it is, and that he has banged many women. After I took in all of
his theories and ideas, he showed me photos of his past girlfriends. I could
not believe my eyes. These chycks were disgusting to look at. I mean we're
talking snouts and entrails here. And since I'm talking how important visuals
are, click here to see an example of the type of brawds this guy was calling
10s
<URL:http://www.scatlovers.com/marys/frames/indexpage/rightframe/marysbio.html>. My favorite qualities about this sweetie was: "...farts loudly every morning in the toilet, doesn't wipe asshole well after shitting."
Point being is that I get very hesitant when guys give advice on "10s" unless I
know they have true discerning taste in judging a chycks beauty in this rank.
The discussion of 10's is not something that should be done without having
established true beauty aesthetics. (Hint- true beauty aesthetics = chycks you
would see in Maxim, swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated, FHM, and the likes)
Chubby chasers need not apply.
|
