The Top Pickup Artist Forum On The Internet: Fast Seduction 101

mASF post by "snowboard"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, January 1, 2004

On 1/29/04 3:13:00 AM, Neo-Rio wrote:
>On 1/28/04 10:09:00 PM, snowboard wrote:
>

>>What did this chyck look like? was she a
>>hottie or a pig? I'm not questioning
>>that people with disabilities can get
>>laid however, generally speaking most
>>people with disabilities are the ones
>>needing to settle for major leftovers. I
>>don't like to be picky here, but end
>>results should determine how valid some
>>technique or ideology is.
>

< --- then Neo wrote : ----->
>Um... she was pretty decent looking,
>mature, and intelligent actually.
>Her parents gave her hell for marrying
>him, but she didn't care. She loved him.
>
>So what's this theory you have?


My first theory is that this chyck is not all that hot looking. Whenever the
word "intelligent" is used to describe how hot looking a chyck is, that usually
means she's ugly, or not attractive.

My point being is that no ideology or theory is worth anything if it doesn't
yield the kind of stunning ass most of us are shooting for.

The Beauty Premium Law states the prettier the chyck is, the more difficult
she's going to be to seduce. This has to be factored in. I think it's safe to
assume most guys here will want to have the prettiest chyck they can get their
dick into. I personally know of a seduction guru wannabee, that shall be
nameless who was raving about how easy it is to seduce women, and had his own
theory of PU. He even showed me some home videos of group orgies he's been in,
and the brawds in these were UGs and swampdonkies. These were chycks I could PU
just by being passed out in their front lawn! suddenly everything he said
simply didn't have any meaning to me.