mASF post by "silver_evlis"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, May 5, 2005sup fellas
i was just reading some stuff by thundercat...and in response to being direct
vs indirect...???
"hey thundercat...IMO indirect is better in a social setting. 1+ set, like in a
club, social gathering, etc, but if's a DEAD cold approach, throw in time
contraints, poor logistics/obstacles...i'll start off indirect if i have
to...but immidiately switch to direct, in a matter of seconds, with a very
sexual undertone, get some response, if negative, make the ho say no, then
befriend her, so she could social proof me. in the process, I'M actually
LJBFing, not vice versa, we go out so that i hook up with other chicks in front
of her, she gets jealous...i'm alpha and non supplicative...i fuck her...she
fucks me...
silver"
as i write this, i haven't really tried shit. but i 'm a believer in being a
'man of my word' and i wanna live up to great expectations...better practice
what i preach...!!!:)
people say not to get validation from women/getting laid, etc,...bet key here
is that we all get VALIDATION FROM GOOD/POSITIVE FEELINGS...if it's women/sex
and that's good, we feel happy and fulfilled.
like computer geeks are driven to learn shit abt computers/programming...thus,
THEY FEEL GOOD - FEELINGS GET VALIDATED
every human is driven to live through and rationalize sets of emotions and any
given time to stabilize who they are and their desires, catch the comforts of
feelings - be it bad when they're happy, and pessimistc around
optimism(confident guy)...
speaking of controlling/managing frames and sucking people into ur
reality...it's twisted in not played accurately,...i've fucked this up so so
badly!!!
this is what makes the science of sedution so complex and mind boggling...the
possibilty of what ifs?
key here is making it fun so i don't give up...
silver.
|
