Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms
page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion
forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
[posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]
mASF post by "Jamster"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, January 1, 2005Ross,
Thundercat was harsher than I would have put it, but he has a point.
When you start by AMOGing with:
>...before finally coming to
>mine.
>
With the presupposition that yours is the ultimate seminar, when I suspect that
many of your guys "finally" end up somewhere else. Do you think I'm mistaken?
I don't really know either way. Just a guess.
>
>It is this constant generating
>of anxiety through freeze
>outs, back turns, etc.
>and that I find objectionable
>in the method; it's playing on
>someone's fears
>and insecurities to get what
>you want.
>
>I've never quite been able to
>put my finger on it or
>articulate it before
You don't recall articulating it? I think they got that from one of your
newsletters. Really.
I'm sure they read the newsletters. I'm also sure the newletters affected them
more than they would care to admit.
I think you articulated that strategy very well in one (or more) of those
excellent newsletters. IIRC you suggested that a good phone message might play
on those very same fears by saying "...you didn't seem to be the person to pass
up an opportunity like this."
I don't have it at hand and I'm too slow to remember it exactly, but it was
impressive and you talked about this very concept. But you were pretty
positive about using it.
Unlike ThunderCat, I'm not being sarcastic. Your newletters are great. Much
of the basic dogma of this group came from them. You are like a founding
father.
OTOH, it seems to me that you are coming here to trash your competition under
the guise of having insight. And you do have insight. Can't deny that.
Please, don't head in the direction of bitter competitor (and I mean that as a
fan).
People here really should think about the whole TD phenomena, but the cynical
view is no more close to the truth then the most big-eyed belief is.
>Comments? QUESTIONS?
OK, so it might not be exactly what you wanted, but I made a stab at
intelligent comment here.
Jamster Geezer
"If you can't be graceful, fake it."
|
Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by
"Jamster" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for
reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the
original author.
