mASF post by "Thundercat"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, January 1, 2005It's posts like this that just illustrate your complete misunderstanding of not
only how women operate, but how guys who are GOOD with women are able to get
them.
On 1/24/05 6:10:00 PM, san***m@at***.com[ ? ] wrote:
>Prior to physically isolating
>a woman, it seems to me that
>the MM/PUA/RSD
>school relies on EMOTIONALLY
>ISOLATING THE TARGET FROM HER
>PEER
>GROUP, triggering a large
>amount of anxiety that is then
>relieved when the
>target is physically taken
>into isolation from the group.
I can't speak for RSD, but I know enough about what Mystery Method is about to
know that part of the game is ingratiating yourself into their peer-group and
getting social proof/validation to make her more comfortable with your
advances.
Seriously, Ross. You've been to MM seminars. Did you learn nothing?
>By ignoring the target,
>ingratiating yourself with the
>peer group, not giving
>her the attention to which she
>is used, you actively increase
>her anxiety,
>which is then relieved when
>you finally DO provide
>attention during the
>physical isolation stage.
>
>It is this constant generating
>of anxiety through freeze
>outs, back turns, etc.
>and that I find objectionable
>in the method; it's playing on
>someone's fears
>and insecurities to get what
>you want.
Ever hear of sexual tension? Maybe not, considering what you teach...
And just to get this straight... you find freeze outs and backturns
objectionable, yet love to teach guys to futz around with internal belief
structures to change a woman's sense of belief and turn them into their willing
love slave?
Oh yeah, what you teach is SOOOOOO much more morally acceptable. (/sarcasm)
>I've never quite been able to
>put my finger on it or
>articulate it before but
>NOW I see it; the method
>requires generating anxiety
>throughout the process.
>
>As much as generating lots of
>comfort is discussed, the
>comfort is
>interrupted and underscored
>with an underlying, unspoken
>message of
>constant possible rejection
>and invalidation.
That's right. That's why it works. The girl starts seeking to please you and
get your validation. This is simple Swinggcat stuff. One would think you'd
have picked this up by osmosis after hanging out with him for years.
>Do we really want to play on
>people's fears to get us what
>we want? And even
>when it works, what is it
>really saying about ourselves?
No, we just wanna hypnotise women to creep out every female in earshot, then do
yoga while jerking off to internet porn.
Hope the five people you had in your seminar had fun.
Thundercat
The ULTIMATE Seduction Blog:
www.thundercatseductionlair.com
Seduction Discussion:
www.seductionlair.com/phpBB/
|
