CostOfSuccess is a member of the mASF forum. Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
Original discussion thread: http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/fs?action=9&boardid=2&read=83843&fid=173
It is STRONGLY my belief that attraction is NOT about "getting the girl" but rather getting the baby, and the GREAT IMPREGNATION.
If you believe in this evolutionary view of attraction let me show you a neat little trick..
In my impregnation post in masterminds below.. I described how, women only have one use.. Being impregnated..
So effectively
Women Don't Reject Men , They Catagorise Them
A man has two uses to a woman
Whilst thats not the same with men
Women Get Rejected, Not Catagorised!
Evolutionarily this means.. Womens bodies, are PARANOID, and MUST strongly display signs of "you can impregnate me well", for her to be able to make babies.
Men don't need to be this paranoid and overt.. Because they are catagorised into two groups..
Men thusly need to be VERY AGGRESSIVE, as opposed to women needing to be PARANOID.
Men need to make sure they are the impregnator and not catagorised as the baby raiser.
Anyways, obviously, a guy is gonna be pissed, if he is this "baby raiser".. So aggression, is what he uses to separate himself from this "baby raiser" catagory.
So evolutionarily.. To get the baby they want.. Men and women are separated into two different groups..
What makes a man attractive is being unique, and aggressive.. Separating from the catagory of useless chumps..
What makes a woman attractive, is the display that she can be impregnated, and impregnated WELL.
A way a girl is sexy on the dance floor, is she displays how you can impregnate her hard, and well..
A way a man is sexy on the dance floor, is he displays he is in the "impregnator catagory".. He shows he is no "baby raiser"..
So what I am saying is.. From an evolutionary stand point.. Men are men, and women are women, because they want THE KID.
Women and men are only different because
This difference in itself, separates the sexes, and the dynamics...
Amazing stuff, no?
If you believe that attraction is all about the baby.. And that having the baby is about evolution, and immortalising what is good and right in the world..
Then this is for you..
Both for the guy, and the girl. This is a deep, spiritual and evolutionary need, that has nothing to do with selfishness and need for validation.
But rather, its all about assuring, that the world is left a better place than we found it.
Whilst men have two uses.. Impregnating the girl, or being a "baby raiser", that the girl controls and betaizes.
Men actually do reject women, based on only one quality. "Can I impregnate her well?"
Thats why their tits and ass are so obviously suggestive of sex.
Women know, their is no second chance dip.. One strike, and you are out baby..
You won't be making babies..
A girls good looks, is actually a way of her body being paranoid, and desperately showing her need for impregnation, so she can have a kid.
The "impregnator" and the "baby raiser"..
Because women will betaize a baby raiser by pretending to have sex with him, but not actually having it that often.. Whilst she goes and fucks an impregnator behind his back (its instinct, and evolution.. Its a good thing she does this!).
Paranoid, highly displaying women
Aggressive, highly unique men
Her tits, and ass are almost like, neon flashing lights.. Grab her, twist here, touch here, for maximum impregnation.
Aggression and "standing out".
a) The woman births the kid and must raise it.. So she catagorises men
b) A man can only impregnate.. So he rejects women not suitable for impregnation
Both want the kid.. But because of the above.. Attaining that kid, works differently for both sexes.
