mASF post by "jim dutton" posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, June 6, 2002In article <3D0***E@sh***.net[ ? ]>,
Kthulah <kth***h@sh***.net[ ? ]> wrote: >John Fereira wrote: >> >> GoddessBaybee <god***e@ya***.com[ ? ]> wrote in >> news:aed***5@dr***.com[ ? ]: >> >> > In article <[email protected]>, John says... >> >> >> >>GoddessBaybee <god***e@ya***.com[ ? ]> wrote in >> >>news:ae8***b@dr***.com[ ? ]: >> >> >> >>> In article <[email protected]>, jjd***d@en***.com[ ? ] says... >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> T. Goddessbabe aka Brittany Spears is a bartender that prick teases >> >>>> married men for tips. It's how she makes her living. She has to look >> >>>> for someone to look down on in order to feel shes not the bottom of >> >>>> societys barrel. Those women from other country sites are the >> >>>> equivalent of americas match.com only the women are on average far >> >>>> more educated. Unlike Goddessbabe. >> >>>> >> >>>> Babe when you shag my next beer shake your ass and I'll consider >> >>>> flippin ya a qwuata. >> >>>> >> >>>> She's also getting sport humped by a canadian for gods sake. >> >>>> >> >>>> -Jeem, HTH >> >>.. >> >>> >> > <snip> >> >>> He then claimed I am uneducated, but he doesn't know the first thing >> >>> about my educational status. >> >> >> >>He probably knows about as much about your educational status as you >> >>know about his wife. >> > >> > <boggle> >> > hey john, >> > i've said straight out that i dont know the specifics of >> > ol' jeembo and the missus's relationship. >> > >> > In article <a6q***s@dr***.com[ ? ]>, >> > GoddessBaybee <god***e@ya***.com[ ? ]> wrote: >> > "I don't know (and I don't care) if your wife is >> > in fact a mail-order bride. If you are sensitive about people taunting >> > you about the "mail-order-bride" issue, then maybe you shouldn't run >> > around mouthing-off and taunting others regarding their >> > relationships...." >> >> I don't think that paragragh comes across as impartial as you're now trying >> to come off. Let's change a few words and see if this looks to you like >> something that was written by someone impartial and non-judgemental. >> >> > "I don't know (and I don't care) if you are >> > in fact a lesbian. If you are sensitive about people taunting >> > you about the "gay" issue, then maybe you shouldn't run >> > around mouthing-off and taunting others regarding their >> > relationships...." >> > >> >>While I haven't actually met the lovely Mrs. Dutton myself I know quite >> >>a few people whose opinions I trust that have. From all reports she's >> >>very charming, quite gorgeous, quite educated, and comes from a *very* >> >>wealthy family. >> > >> > <doubleboggle> >> > ...even if Mrs. D. is in fact a "mail order bride" >> > i dont think that would imply that Mrs. D. aint a charming, gorgeous >> > and educated woman. I personally wouldn't suggest that she isn't. >> >> ...even if you are a lesbian I think that I would imply that you might not >> be attractive an intelligent. >> >> You're essentially strongly implying that she is a mail order bride (she >> isn't) without categorically stating that she is. A semantantical >> difference, maybe, but from where I'm sitting the intent seems to be the >> same. >> >> > >> >>The other stereotype which you eluded to was the implication that if >> >>someone Marries a woman from a poorer country, he is doing so out of >> >>desparation because he is unable to attract a quality woman from this >> >>country. As I have seen with my own eyes the kind of woman he's >> >>managed to attract long before he met his wife, I know for a fact that >> >>Jeem doesn't have that problem. >> > >> > hey john, I've read more than a couple of your articles, >> > and you seem fairly level headed to me...so i want to ask you a couple >> > o' questions (i dont really care if you answer 'em publicly or not) >> > i guess i just want you to think about 'em. >> >> Ok, shoot. >> >> > >> > first, jim dutton wrote regarding the women on the >> > "russian women catalog"* sites >> > >> > "Those women from other country sites are the equivalent of >> > americas match.com only the women are on average far more educated." >> > >> > from your perspective, do you think that's a true statement? >> >> From my perspective, I really don't have enough information to go on. I've >> never looked at match.com or a russian women catalog so my perspective on >> the educational status from either forum would by entirely based on >> hearsay. Just as a general impression though, when personal ads have been >> posted in newsgroups that I read from Russian woman I have noticed a >> general tendency of claims which indicate a high level of education whereas >> when I've seen personal ads posted by American woman, typically educational >> status isn't even mentioned. The only conclusion that I can draw from that >> is that perhaps Russian women feel that their educational status is a more >> important criteria for "selling themselves" as a potential mate than >> American women seem to rate it. >> > >> > specifically, do ya think russian women tend to be better educated than >> > their american counterparts? >> >> Again, I really don't have enough evidence to make such a determination. >> Just out of curiosity, why is this important to you? Frankly, the level of >> formal education isn't an important criteria to me. I've been in long term >> relationships with women with little formal education and am married to a >> woman that holds a PhD in clinical psychology. >> >> > even if you agree with that part, do you think that's the *ONLY* >> > significant difference? >> >> No, I don't, but that perspective is likely based mostly on stereotypes. >> That's primarily based on the criteria upon which the users of those system >> use for selecting a mate. My general sense is that the most important >> criteria for women posting their profiles on the mail order bride site is >> that the person they are looking for is living in the U.S.. However women >> seeking men on U.S. based sites typically want someone in close proximity, >> but criteria such as physical appearance, age, financial responsibility >> (which I don't necessarily conclude as meaning "filthy rich"), basic >> philosophies about family or religion, and general personality traits (must >> have a good sense of humor), all seem to play a more important role. >> Again, that's must my general sense. >> >> > >> > * btw, i'm not trying to be derogatory by calling it a "russian women >> > catalog" >> > That is actually what the site we were discussing calls itself. >> > "http://www.russian-women-catalog.com/" >> > other sites mentioned in this thread are called >> > "http://www.bridesbymail.com/" >> > "http://www.mailorderbrides.com/" >> > >> > Dutton initiated this episode of our lil flame war because I said >> > (regarding the mail-order-bride sites) that those women were hoping to >> > re-locate from a poorer nation to a wealthier nation via marriage. >> > >> > I don't think that's a controversial statement. >> >> I don't think it is either...when taken out of context. When put into the >> context of round one of your lil flame war, and the implication that his >> wife is a mail order bride, I'm not surprised that he responded. What I >> *have* noticed is that after round one of your lil flame war, you both went >> back to your corners for awhile but you've both been poking at each other. >> I know that Jeem has never been hesitant to partake in a bit of virtual >> fist-i-cuffs and from the looks of it, you don't seem to be crying uncle >> too quickly either. >> >> > >> > The next question, i want to ask you is... >> > ..can you honestly say the comments i've made about jeem and his family >> > are worse than the comments jeem's made about me and my family? >> > >> > how about the comments 'ol jeembo makes regularly regarding countless >> > other posters and their families? >> > >> Jeem makes a lot of "yo momma" cracks. > > >I would like to nominate the above sentence for soc.singles-sycophant >understatement of the year. > > >> That's hardly news. If he didn't >> get a reaction from them I doubt that he would continue to do it. > > >That has not been my observation. > > >> From the >> perspective that I have actually met Jeem on several occasions as well as >> at least part of his family, I can see any comments made about him and his >> family in a different context. You would really have to experience Jeem in >> real life, hear his voice, and see how he interacts with other people to >> understand. > > >What part of Jeem is it that we (as in the people he has chosen to >continually shame himself over online) are we not seeing? > >Are you calling him a liar, who is purposefully deceiving people about >his thoughts of them?
Bowlingball head is still fuming I pointed out what an obese skank she is. Her "i can win a beauty pageant in two weeks" was the most deluded thing I have ever read on usenet.
The second was how her leatherclad posse packing heat would teach me a lesson
-Jeem, It's good to know she obsesses about me. Hey ma I'm doing ok!!
|