mASF post by "Ali Siddiqui" posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, October 10, 1998> I was just sitting here tonight, bullshitting and reading through the posts of > alt.seduction and alt.romance when something occurred to me for some > reason. There is a certain "war of the sexes" going on these days. Let me > see if I can articulate and make this clear. Men are reading books and > studying systems on how to seduce women and to put it quite bluntly, how > to get laid. Women are reading books on how to control and manipulate men > or to keep from being seduced by men who are good at seducing, or to keep > from putting out for as long as possible while getting what THEY want. > > In other words, it seems to come down to a lot of measures and > counter-measures and counter-counter-measures, etc, etc. A lot like > war in a way isn't it? Well shit, now I seem to have lost the point I was > driving at. Well anyway, Men have all the weapons of Speed Seduction > and books on how to be the Jerk that gets women, and women have books > like "The Rules" and cosmopolitan to help them along. > > So what the hell is this all really coming down to? I know that women have > for years been studying the art of seduction and have always had their circle > of > inner friends to talk with. Men are just now starting to wake up and pull their > head out of their asses and realize that they better start studying these > things > if they even hope to put themselves on an equal playing field with women. > > But does it not seem like sooner or later all these seduction measures and > counter-measures will be seen for what they really are and eventually > become useless, at least in a sense? Or at least its' efficacy reduced to bare > minimum? As an example, since "The Rules" was published, doesn't that sort of > blow the game plan for women? Since all men will be reading it. Likewise with > men, anything that could be > potentially very useful, being published, doesn't it eventually lose most of > its' effectiveness? Or am I just paranoid and reading something into it that > just > isn't there? > > AH1
Ahh you are talking about a very long but interesting topic. It is not
as simple as you think it is. Alot of women have dreams about one day
meeting their knight in shining armour... but they also kindof
instinctivly know that all men men want is actaully under their skirts
:) They are alos kindof pissed off about the instincts they ahve as
women: Like:
why do they like strong men, but men are much more interested in looks?
why do they like inteligetnt rescourceful men, but men are still more
interested in looks?
why don't they care much about how much men have been around while men
prefer more "virginal" type
I think these types of questions in womens minds cause them to put up a
defence or to get into things like feminism in persuit of equality....
but also satifaction or "having it all"
that is a very brief summary of my theories on feminism and "sex wars".
This only covered the female side of the war.
|